Journal of Dental Sciences
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 40-44, March 2009

Maximum mouth opening of ethnic Chinese in Taiwan

Department of Dentistry, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Received 16 December 2008; accepted 4 February 2009.

Article Outline

Background/purpose

Maximum mouth opening (MMO) is a significant diagnostic reference for many clinical conditions. However, the number of relevant studies is limited, and the relationship between age and MMO has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to measure and analyze the MMO of ethnic Chinese adults in Taiwan and to examine the possible relationship between age and MMO.

Materials and methods

A total of 1442 adult ethnic Chinese (Taiwanese) subjects aged 20–80 years (705 males, 737 females) were randomly selected. Subjects were divided into three age groups: 20–39 years (young), 40–59 years (middle), and ≥ 60 years (senior), and their maximum voluntary mouth opening was measured. Independent sample t test and one-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Scheffé test were used to examine differences in MMO relative to sex and age groups. A simple linear regression model was used to estimate the relationship between MMO and age.

Results

The average MMO for sample subjects was 49.10 ± 6.30 mm, and the MMO of males (49.92 ± 6.55 mm) was significantly larger than that of females (48.32 ± 5.95 mm; P < 0.001). MMO significantly decreased with increasing age, regardless of sex. The average MMO values were 51.11 ± 6.47 mm, 48.45 ± 5.76 mm, and 46.62 ± 5.71 mm for the young, middle and senior age groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In the regression model, it was estimated that for every 10 years, MMO decreased by about 1.4 mm in males and 0.9 mm in females. For the age range of 20–80 years, the regression equation is: MMO (mm) = 56.60−0.14×age, for males; and MMO (mm) = 52.33−0.09×age, for females.

Conclusion

Within the limits of this study, we concluded that both sex and age have significant influences on the MMO value of ethnic Chinese in Taiwan, and age is a significant predictor of MMO measurements.

Key Words:  Chinese , maximum mouth opening , Taiwan

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Dworkin SF , LeResche L , DeRouen T , Von Korff M . Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: reliability of clinical examiners . J Prosthet Dent . 1990;63:574–579
  2. Miller VJ , Bookhan V , Brummer D , Singh JC . A mouth opening index for patients with temporomandibular disorders . J Oral Rehabil . 1999;26:534–537
  3. Mezitis M , Rallis G , Zachariades N . The normal range of mouth opening . J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1989;47:1028–1029
  4. Agerberg G . Maximal mandibular movements in young men and women . Sven Tandlak Tidskr . 1974;67:81–100
  5. Szentpetery A . Clinical utility of mandibular movement ranges . J Orofac Pain . 1993;7:163–168
  6. Sheppard IM , Sheppard SM . Maximal incisal opening: a diagnostic index? . J Dent Med . 1965;20:13–15
  7. Bergman B , Carlsson GE . Review of 54 complete denture wearers: patients' opinions 1 year after treatment . Acta Odontol Scand . 1972;30:399–414
  8. Solberg WK , Woo MW , Houston JB . Prevalence of mandibu-lar dysfunction in young adults . J Am Dent Assoc . 1979;98:25–34
  9. Landtwing K . Evaluation of the normal range of vertical mandibular opening in children and adolescents with special reference to age and stature . J Maxillofac Surg . 1978;6:157–162
  10. Placko G , Bellot-Samson V , Brunet S , et al.   Normal mouth opening in the adult French population . Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac . 2005;106:267–271 [In French, English abstract]
  11. Gallagher C , Gallagher V , Whelton H , Cronin M . The normal range of mouth opening in an Irish population . J Oral Rehabil . 2004;31:110–116
  12. Ingervall B . Range of movement of mandible in children . Scand J Dent Res . 1970;78:311–322
  13. Ingervall B . Variation of the range of movement of the mandible in relation to facial morphology in young adults . Scand J Dent Res . 1971;79:133–140
  14. Westling L , Helkimo E . Maximum jaw opening capacity in adolescents in relation to general joint mobility . J Oral Rehabil . 1992;19:485–494
  15. Dijkstra PU , de Bont LG , Stegenga B , Boering G . Angle of mouth opening measurement: reliability of a technique for temporomandibular joint mobility assessment . J Oral Rehabil . 1995;22:263–268
  16. Higbie EJ , Seidel-Cobb D , Taylor LF , Cummings GS . Effect of head position on vertical mandibular opening . J Orthop Sports Phys Ther . 1999;29:127–130
  17. Eriksson PO , Haggman-Henrikson B , Nordh E , Zafar H . Coordinated mandibular and head-neck movements during rhythmic jaw activities in man . J Dent Res . 2000;79:1378–1384
  18. Visscher CM , Huddleston Slater JJ , Lobbezoo F , Naeije M . Kinematics of the human mandible for different head postures . J Oral Rehabil . 2000;27:299–305
  19. Cox SC , Walker DM . Establishing a normal range for mouth opening: its use in screening for oral submucous fibrosis . Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1997;35:40–42
  20. Wood GD , Branco JA . A comparison of three methods of measuring maximal opening of the mouth . J Oral Surg . 1979;37:175–177
  21. Agerberg G . Maximal mandibular movements in children . Acta Odontol Scand . 1974;32:147–159
  22. Pullinger AG , Liu SP , Low G , Tay D . Differences between sexes in maximum jaw opening when corrected to body size . J Oral Rehabil . 1987;14:291–299

PII: S1991-7902(09)60007-6

doi:10.1016/S1991-7902(09)60007-6

Journal of Dental Sciences
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 40-44, March 2009

Article Tools